Listen, there's been a lot of buzz lately about "GTM Engineers" - this hot new hybrid role supposedly combining go-to-market strategy with technical implementation capabilities.

But after building revenue systems for companies ranging from series A startups to enterprise organizations, I'm seeing a fundamental disconnect in how we're approaching technical revenue leadership.

The GTM Engineer identity crisis

The "GTM Engineer" title suffers from a core problem: it suggests both engineering chops AND strategic GTM expertise living in the same person.

In reality, this unicorn barely exists.

Most self-described GTM Engineers fall into one of two camps:

  1. Former RevOps folks who've upleveled their title but still focus primarily on technical implementation of someone else's strategy
  2. GTM strategists who've learned just enough technical skills to be dangerous but can't actually build robust systems

What's interesting is that the work I've been doing as a Systems Architect encompasses much of what "GTM Engineers" claim to do - building lead routing architectures, creating data activation frameworks, implementing strategic playbooks - but with a crucial difference in approach.

The RevOps revolution: Systems-first thinking

The real transformation happening right now isn't about title inflation - it's about a fundamental shift in how we approach revenue operations:

1. Human-first technical implementation

Take lead routing. Most implementers think about the technical mechanics: "How do I configure the workflow to distribute leads?".

What they miss is the human element:

"How do your SDRs get paid?"

This simple question completely changes the implementation approach. If you don't understand compensation structures, you'll build technically "correct" systems that create team conflict.

Real example: A company with 4 SDRs assigned specific email domains. When 5 domains got flagged, one SDR's commission plummeted through no fault of his own.

He quit within 90 days, and the company lost both a trained SDR and $385,000 in pipeline.

The solution isn't complex technology - it's human-centered system design:

  • Push all leads to CRM as single source of truth
  • Implement round-robin assignment workflow
  • Create proper contact-company associations
Getting compensation planning right with Emily Garza
On this episode of RevOps Unboxed, Sandy sits down with Emily Garza to discuss all things compensation planning. Listen now.
Revenue Operations AllianceRebecca Stewart

2. From Enrichment to Activation

The strategic shift from "data collection" to "revenue activation" separates real practitioners from title-chasers.

Anyone can connect Clay to HubSpot and populate fields. The value comes from turning that data into action:

Instead of "We enrich your CRM with company data" (commodity service), the real value is in "We've built decision frameworks that trigger specific actions based on data signals" (strategic service).

For example:

  • If company size > 500 employees → Use enterprise messaging
  • If recently funded → Mention expansion use cases
  • If using competitor X → Highlight specific migration benefits

These playbooks transform static data into revenue-generating systems.

The integration that changes everything

The "aha" moment comes when you combine these approaches - human-centered technical implementation with strategic data activation - to create a complete revenue system.

This isn't about being a "GTM Engineer" - it's about building orchestrated systems that:

  1. Route information to the right people at the right time
  2. Provide context that drives intelligent decisions
  3. Create scalable, repeatable processes
  4. Deliver measurable revenue impact

My clients who implement this systems-first approach see:

  • 37% increase in response rates
  • 42% faster sales cycles
  • Zero SDR turnover (down from 25%)
  • 3.5x ROI within first 90 days
What is GTM engineering? The complete growth guide
Go-to-market (GTM) engineering seems to be the word on everyone’s lips, but what exactly is this new term, and why has it sparked so much debate?
Revenue Operations AllianceElla Harrison

Beyond titles: The mindset shift

The real value doesn't come from calling yourself a "GTM Engineer" or "RevOps Architect" - it comes from a fundamental mindset shift:

Stop thinking about:

  • Data enrichment
  • Lead assignment
  • CRM fields
  • System integration

Start thinking about:

  • Revenue activation
  • Strategic routing
  • Decision frameworks
  • Business orchestration

This approach requires two distinct but complementary skill sets:

  1. Deep technical implementation knowledge
  2. Strategic business understanding

Rather than pretending one person masters both equally (they rarely do), the most effective setup pairs strategic GTM leaders with technical systems architects in true partnership.

I've built my career on being the technical partner to visionary GTM strategists - not by claiming I can replace them.

Together, we build revenue systems that actually work.

The companies winning in 2025 aren't debating job titles - they're building integrated systems that turn strategy into consistent revenue. That's the real revolution happening right now.

Spencer first published this article on LinkedIn here.